Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Between the Lines 
 Lessons for Australia in bailout 

Lessons for Australia in bailout

It is to be hoped that George W Bush's rescue package will help stabilise the United States economy, relieving the pressures that have been forcing our economic fortunes downward.

It has been a hard fight with a Congress that clearly has little faith in this accident-prone administration.

Although Prime Minister Rudd, along with many other Western leaders, exhorted Congress to agree to this bailout, the reservations of US legislators are easy to understand. In a matter of weeks Congress will face American voters, who are stirred up. Much of the electorate was understandably unimpressed with the idea of spending taxpayer dollars to bail out those predator financial institutions many blame for this credit crisis.

In the end, the rescue package was passed unenthusiastically by Congress to everyone's relief.

However, serious doubts remain about it, and recovery may not be just around the corner.

The bailout is certainly welcome by the financial institutions, the spinal column of a capitalist free-market economy.

There was no real alternative to this action to arrest the downward plunge. The $800 billion package may seem huge, but just how far it will go to get the US economy back on track will depend on its implementation.

Australia should not let this crisis pass without taking a critical look at the functioning of our own economic system. Our banking system may be sound, but there are unattended problems in our version of the modern capitalist system.

It is too driven by the kind of greed and opportunism that underlies the present crisis.

There is too little focus on the common good; on the welfare of those of us who get caught up in the weaknesses of the system. Let's face it, the free market is anything but free. Much is made of those buzzwords transparency and accountability, much loved by our politicians. In the end it widens income disparities, leaving us less free - captives of an increasingly uncompetitive economic environment.

The present crisis has, however, led to a new international awareness. Hopefully it will lead to a critical look at the nature of the economic system that had developed around us. We need reform and restructuring, a need recognised by the major EU nations now meeting in Brussels, but a wider international response is necessary.

Last column, I referred to the International Monetary Fund, a UN agency that could be used to co-ordinate global action for change. It has taken on the task of promoting sustainable development and economic growth in developing countries. Unlike the World Bank, which is under strong US influence, the IMF, whose chief is usually European, is closer to the EU.

In the present circumstances the IMF could be charged with the developing of reforms designed to ensure economic practices are more consistent with those egalitarian international human rights standards we have all ratified. In the reality of our world we cannot eliminate inequalities and disparities, but we should be moving more purposefully in the direction of reducing these disparities, which underlie most conflicts.

James Dunn is an author with four decades of experience as a foreign affairs official and with UN agencies.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Comments


No comments were posted for this article.
Between the Lines
Offering you a new spin on the news of the day and the topics that often get us hot under the collar. Sometimes serious, sometimes humorous but always worth a look.

4:36 PM AEDT | Should James Bond be allowed to age?
D & D Services
 
South Coast Trucks
 
Butler and Pollock
 
TIGS
 
Illawarra Mercury Drive
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...