Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Night of the wolves for Nelson 

Night of the wolves for Nelson

The wolves are howling in the hills. They are stalking. They are hungry. And they have identified their next victim. This is the cruel and menacing spectacle we have in Australian public life - yet again - on the eve of the first budget handed down by a federal Labor government in 13 years. Sitting opposite the Treasurer and the Prime Minister will be a new Leader of the Opposition who has already been marked for political death.

There is almost nothing Brendan Nelson can do about the leadership predicament he has been handed but be patient and not push too hard too early while the public is not interested. Everything is stacked against him. While the seed and the details of a new narrative about Kevin Rudd have taken root - that he is a megalomaniac - it will take time to grow, if it grows at all.

But time is not what Nelson has been given. The waiting game, and patience in general, is simply not an option for the wolf pack now tracking his every move. Without a shred of empathy, or irony, or self-reflection, the unelected and unaccountable hunting pack of the Canberra political media have marked his leadership for political death for no other reason than that he remains naive and vulnerable, and the wolf pack always targets the naive and vulnerable.

Because one thing the Canberra press corps cannot abide is leadership stability, or the absence of leadership tension. That is a race that must never end, one of the reasons why we have had a new federal leader of the Liberal or Labor parties, on average, every 20 months for the past 24 years: Bill Hayden gave way to Bob Hawke, who gave way to Paul Keating, who gave way to Kim Beazley, who gave way to Simon Crean, who gave way to Mark Latham, who gave way to Beazley again, who gave way to Rudd, all as Malcolm Fraser gave way to Andrew Peacock, who gave way to John Howard, who gave way to Peacock, who gave way to John Hewson, who gave way to Alexander Downer, who gave way to Howard again.

Even as Howard kept winning elections his retirement was the subject of endless speculation and his deputy's ambitions were endlessly paraded.

Now it's Nelson's turn as Liberal leader, and the speculation began the day after he was elected.

Thus it has been written, repeatedly, that the 2008 federal budget, and the following 24 hours, present a moment of truth for Nelson, who must prove himself with a steely, impressive budget reply or face a party coup by the end of the year. If he passes that hurdle, he must survive the first federal byelection test. If he passes that test … and on and on.

The truth is, this is all entirely artificial. Beyond the gossip the only substance behind the stalking and speculation is the opinion polls. But opinion polls are created for, by and of the media to generate artificial news and manipulate public opinion. They are the bedrock of the endless flux and blood sport over leadership.

The idea that Brendan Nelson is in jeopardy because he has been polling very low numbers as "preferred prime minister" must be one of the most perverse and pointless acts in the history of political commentary.

Of course Nelson is polling poorly as preferred prime minister. His party's leadership was decapitated, with not only the prime minister and party standard-bearer losing his seat at the last election, but his deputy and heir apparent, Peter Costello, losing the will to take up the leadership but not finding the will to leave Parliament. The worst of both worlds for Nelson. A tired government has been replaced and a hyperactive new Prime Minister is in control.

Making Nelson's predicament even more difficult is the espoused conservatism of Kevin Rudd, who is determined that Labor will become the party which exploits the proven conservatism of the Australian electorate. Thus his Government is supporting the privatisation of the power generation industry in NSW and opposing gay marriage. It is committed to fiscal prudence, and even willing to countenance the introduction of boarding schools for Aboriginal children from abusive homes.

In short, Rudd is shrewdly attacking the Liberals from the centre-right.

Worse, Nelson is the head of a party in serious structural decline and financial stress.

Nine years ago, in an essay titled "The Parties Are Over", I argued: "Compulsory voting is propping up an illusion. Behind the illusion, behind the surface opera of politics, the foundations of traditional Australian politics are rotting away … The major parties are no longer grassroots movements; they no longer reflect the mainstreams they purport to represent … More than 80 per cent of Liberal Party members in NSW are over the age of 55 … The ranks are not just ageing. Membership in NSW has dropped from 50,000 in 1975 to a rump of about 6,000 active members now … "

Nine years and three federal elections later, nothing has changed or improved. Labor has also shrunk into a political club - 90 per cent of federal Labor MPs had prior careers either as union officials, parliamentary staffers, labour lawyers, or as ALP officials - but the big and defining difference between Liberal and Labor is that Labor holds power in all nine federal, state and territory governments across Australia.

If all this were not bad enough for Nelson, he has the brooding, hyperactive, media-savvy opportunist Malcolm Turnbull at his back. And, for reasons best known to himself, he has appointed an incurable Machiavellian, Christopher Pyne, a member of his shadow cabinet.

At this point, the best armour for Nelson and his party is patience and nerve. The wolves may be howling, but they don't have to be fed.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
As you correctly point out the membership of both parties has declined. The membership of both parties will probably continue to decline. Those who control the parties do not want large memberships. The more members a party has the more likely it is that those in power will have to justify their policies, and listen to criticism. The Liberal Party, with very little effort, should win the next election in NSW, because the Labor government does not care what its members or the public think, and they see no reason to properly justify their actions. The ongoing media attack on leadership of the parties is a very lazy way of writing column inches. Very little critical analysis is done by the media, and virtually no investigative reporting designed to reveal the basis for government decisions. But attacks on leaders is harmless; the wolves are merely taking out the lame. If the federal Liberals were other than a bunch of self seeks they might protect Nelson by working hard to develop cogent policies, and by critically analysing decisions taken by the Labor government. The NSW Liberals do not engage in the development of policies and critical analysis of government decisions, and they have been out of power for a very long time. Perhaps the real problem is that the Labor and Liberal parties are clones.
Posted by Robert on 12/05/2008 4:44:45 PM
The MEDIA control everything these days. Just take Grant Hackett for example - the media snapped a photo of a bloated stomach after a 10 klm swim and hypes Australia and the other media into believing he is overweight and not fit enough to go to the olympics. It started a national phone poll on A Current Affair "Do you think Grant is too fat to go to the Olympics". Grant's reply was to the effect that the media are all telling lies, blowing things all out of proportion. I believe they have a lot to answer for. They think they are experts in every field, think they are hollier than anyone else and are not held accountable for the lives & reputations of people they ruin. Media are responsible for the many restrictions that are placed on us by hyping up stories, which through media pressure result in laws being changed and our civil rights being challenged. This world would be a better place if non hyped and bias media reporting became mandatory. A system where proof must be accompanied with the details of a news story.
Posted by Please Louise on 12/05/2008 5:19:54 PM
Please don't malign wolves so.
Posted by Voter on 13/05/2008 2:14:01 PM
Very interesting comment. Nelson's predicament is his rise or fall will ultimately depend on the media hype or lack of it. And is K Rudd really the epitome of what was the labor party? Politics have become so convoluted that no party is what it originally was, and are not representative. Maybe true transparency is needed to see what it really is about
Posted by Jan on 14/05/2008 9:26:40 AM
part politics is antidemocratic. We'd be better with one party in which the public were members.
Posted by wideeyed on 14/05/2008 2:25:14 PM
the media pack may be baying for blood, but who in the party would be stupid enough to challenge this soon after the election drubbing. nelson should be quite safe for some time yet, as the whipping boy. after all who really wants to be leader of the opposition this far out from a winnable election which is at least 2 terms away, barring something catastrophic.
Posted by minjerriba on 14/05/2008 4:57:45 PM
Right, don't smear the noble animal wolf by comparing it with the craven cowards in the Liberal party that allowed a nasty little liar to hold the country back 30 years, 50 years in the case of the Aborigines. How can supposedly intelligent, adult human beings allow themselves to be so mesmerised that they let all kinds of dehumanising, nation-hurting policies pass just because their tinpot dictator makes them? Just as well we put them in the desert. Let them crawl in a hole to sort themselves out and re-emerge as something that deserves the name party - none too soo, I hope.
Posted by Diet Simon on 15/05/2008 8:13:06 PM
just discovered CT blogs, who are you mr sheehan? what qualifies you for this blog? you shouldn't waste space with silly statements like - "the unelected and unaccountable hunting pack of the Canberra political media have marked his leadership for political death for no other reason than that he remains naive and vulnerable". i dont want a naive and vulnerable person leading the country but you must be from a nice planet where nice people do nice things in a nice way. that attitude gives canberrans a bad name. regards
Posted by jon on 16/05/2008 3:20:02 PM
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!
Illustration by Rocco
Illustration by Rocco

4:36 PM AEDT | Should James Bond be allowed to age?
Butler and Pollock
 
TIGS
 
D & D Services
 
South Coast Trucks
 
Illawarra Mercury Drive
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...